Dragnet Verbal Reasoning Questions and Answers


The International Olympics Committee (IOC) is responsible for selecting a host city seven years prior to the games. During a rigorous selection process lasting two years, The IOC evaluates the candidates cities’ proposal and their ability to finance the games. Hosting the Olympics involves enormous expense- the 2008 Beijing Olympics, for Example, cost $43 billion. Expenditure includes the construction of stadia, infrastruction Improvements, and direct operating costs, such as athlete housing and security. Proponents believe that the outlay is justifiable, as the Olympics stimulate regeneration create jobs and increase tourism and media attention. They also bring unquantifiable “ benefits, such as prestige and ’’feel good factor”. However, detractors counter that the 17-day event rarely returns a profit, typically runs over budget, and leads to higher taxes for locals. Montreal, for example, took 30 years to pay off the debt it incurred by hosting the Winter Olympics in 1976. Furthermore, state of-the-art venues-such as Beijing’s $500 million Bird’s Nest-o often stand empty after the closing ceremonies finish. While The last three summer Olympics have left their host cities with huge debts, a successful Games can transform a city. Improvements made to Barcelona before the 1992 games created an enduring tourist destination


71)

Which of these two statements must be true?


(True) The Olympics can lead to a long-term boost in foreign visitors
Improvements made to Barcelona before the 1992 games created an ENDURING tourist destination

(Cannot say) It usually takes decade for a host city to pay off its debt
Despite the fact that a case of such exist, it does not necessarily follow that all cases of hosting should be the same

(True) A host city assumes fiscal responsibility for the games
Very true – Fiscal means public money especially taxes

(False) Improved infrastructure, such as the creation of athlete accommodation, is one of the benefits to host city
It is not a benefit but expenditure – as seen in line 5 of the passage

The legal term double jeopardy refers to a second prosecution of an individual for an offence for which he has already been prosecuted. Double jeopardy is famously prohibited in the Fifth Amendment of the United States constitution,  which states that no person shall, “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Not only does the double jeopardy doctrine uphold the finality of criminal proceedings, it also protects individuals from the stress of multiple prosecutions. Despite dating back to Roman times, this legal rule is often challenged. Some legal reform advocates believe that a second trial should be permitted if significant new evidence becomes available – for example DNA evidence can reveal more using more recent technology. Double jeopardy laws are intended to protect innocent people from continual harassment by the state. They also prevent a defendant from receiving successive
trials for the same offence – for instance, someone found guilty of murder cannot also be tried for manslaughter for the same act. Some exceptions exist. A new trial is allowed if the original trial is declared a mistrial, or if an appeal against a conviction is successful. The rules also do not restrict a different sovereignty from prosecuting for the same offence. Similarly, in the United States, civil proceedings can be brought against someone who has already been acquitted or convicted of committing the offence.


72)

Which of these two statements must be true?


(Cannot say)These laws were first expressed in the fifth amendment of the U.S constitution
The passage says the law was famously PROHIBITED in the Fifth Amendment of the United States constitution

(True) Double jeopardy rule is often challenged
Very true – as seen in line 7 of the passage

(Cannot say) States are known to use these rule to harass people
Though these laws were installed to protect people from state harassment, there is no are no account in the passage that shows that States are known to use these rule to harass people

(True) All other factors kept constant, this rule uphold the finality of criminal proceedings
Very true – as seen in line 5 and 6 of the passage

73)

Which of these two statements must be true?


(True) New technology can shed new light on old cases
Very true – as seen in line 9 and 10 of the passage

(Cannot say) Africa does not practice Double jeopardy laws
This was not stated in the passage

(False) Double jeopardy laws were first practised in the U.S
Cannot be true because it had dated back to the Roman time

(True) A new trial is allowed if the original trial is declared a mistrial
Very true – as seen in line the fourth and fifth line of the second paragraph

74)

Which of these two statements must be true?


(True) These laws prevent the government from persecuting innocent individuals.
Very true – as seen in line first and second line of the second paragraph

(False) No new trial is allowed after the conclusion of the former
New trial can be allowed for some reasons – as seen in line 14 – 16 of the passage

(False) Only DNA evidence can allow for a second trial
A new trial is allowed if the original trial is declared a mistrial, or if an appeal against a conviction is successful

(True) The legal rule has come a very long way
It was dated back to Roman times

75)

Which of these two statements must be true?


(False) An acquitted person can never be retried for the same offence.
Some exceptions exist - as seen in line 14 - 17 of the passage

(Cannot say) Criminal and civil proceedings fulfil different objectives in the United States.
This is not a stated fact in the passage

(True) Double jeopardy laws are protective laws
Very true – as seen in line 11

(True) Different authorities can prosecute for the same offence
Very true – as seen in the last 3 lines